Posted: February 2, 2010 in Uncategorized

OK, here’s another possibility : the new Olympus m4/3 camera is almost out of the bag, with the ‘official’ announcement due shortly …probably tomorrow.

The visuals on the above are what we’d see if some rangefinder-styling were to be added to the body’s front central section. The good news for many will be both the low entry price for a genuine Olympus m43 model, and the fact that they’re not financially penalised for wanting it in a black finish !

Have to say, I find this an attractive-looking model that Olympus would do well to cover – this is a look that many seek, without huge expense. Yes, it’s plastic-bodied, but surely capable of great images, as it shares the same sensor as the E-P1. Price/availability tbc …but worth the wait, I’m sure.

Ideal then as a serious upgrade to LX3 image quality, at what’s very likely to be a very competitive price.




We already knew that the m43 market was hotting-up…..so, that’s really the question :

Is it for real ?  Would you like it to be ?

Indeed, IS this what you‘ve been waiting for ?  Leave a comment !


Posted: January 8, 2010 in Uncategorized


Well, if you’d read my last post – I know, it was some time ago – you’ll know that m43 has been on my mind as a potentially superior recording medium without the inconvenience of a larger system. A natural successor to the LX3, you might say. Still small, still doesn’t (quite!) fit into the pocket, still straightforward to use. Highly satisfying.

Given the announcement of the Olympus E-P2 a couple of months or so ago, and following very much research on my part, I made a decision based on the fact that E-P2 was to be no more or less of a compromise  (like most things in life) than the E-P1.

I preferred the cosmetics of the Olympus E-P1, with its highly-polished stainless steel exterior, and its great feel in the hand making it seem something special …which it has truly proved to be.  I bought it for its substantially improved image quality over the still-stunning LX3 – but there’s no getting away from the fact that large sensors will always perform far better than smaller ones – alongside the benefits of great in-body image stabilisation, multi-aspect options, built-in level and many other features that make one’s photographic life easier. However, there’s one thing that’s built-in to the E-P1 that you can’t put a price on : inspiration.

Inspiration to get out there, anytime, anywhere, almost regardless of the weather …. and to Shoot. And Enjoy.      Every Time.

Of course, none of this would count if the image quality wasn’t exceptional – which, for its size & price (we’re not talking Leica M9 at £5K plus glass here) – it really is. Thanks to the best exposure accuracy I’ve so far experienced in a camera, superb colour rendition, and carefully-judged tone curves combining to give jpeg output better than anything I’ve used so far…and with a correctly set-up E-P1, you’re guaranteed excellent results every time.

So What Now ?   So, what of my LX3 ?  Sold it to a new owner in South London, who I hope gets as much enjoyment from it as I have. And what of LX3 Imaging ? Well, it’s going to evolve into ‘E-P1 Imaging’ if you like, but I’ll just keep posting here – for those of you that may be interested.

It’s a continuing photographic journey, and if you decide to progress to an E-P1, or just take an interest in its usage, join me here. It goes on with an inspirational tool that I feel has already opened up my photography, sharpened my vision, increased my enjoyment of photography. High praise indeed. But it really has a lot to do with that priceless in-built USP I mentioned above – and it’s one thing that you won’t find measured in a ‘lab’ test ….and it’s also one that some much more expensive kit just can’t begin to compete with.  Fallen for it ? Unequivocally, YES !

As usual, E-P1 portfolio at http://nickbland.zenfolio.com ….E-P1 2010 / E-P1 2009 / E-P1 Monochrome and more !



It of course could be construed as either :

‘Fallen for It ?’ … head-over-heels with these new, high quality cameras (& lenses) that offer SLR quality in miniature Or : 

‘Fallen for It ?’ … the Penny/Doris marketing (wrong !) of a system solution to a non-existent problem

There are certainly at least two schools of thought on the arrival of m43, now that both Olympus & Panasonic have truly small bodies, along with a few m43lenses. I definitely lean towards the former, although, in my last post, I indicated that I already have several compacts & DSLRs …but, so far, no Micro Four-Thirds camera (or lenses) …and here’s why :

1/ There’s so far a distinct shortage of available lenses in the m43 format …although there are several potentially useful 43 lenses  eg one that caught my eye today, the Olympus 12-60  ie 24-120mm equivalent – but it’s a fairly large lens, relative to m43 body size, and it pretty well negates the point of a useful, truly miniaturised system.

2/ The end of October sees a likely New Product announcement from Olympus – and the general concensus is that this will be something along the lines of ‘E-P2’ …probably with the inclusion of an in-built viewfinder, and possibly on-board flash.

3/ I learned today that following at least one major Ricoh Japan/Ricoh UK staff meeting last year, Ricoh will definitely be in the ‘small body/interchangeable lenses’ game …and some product is likely fairly soon

4/ Nikon are apparently developing a ‘2.5x’ small system …so, for example, a 10mm lens will be equivalent to 25mm (in 35mm terms) …and surely so must Canon and, by implication, Sony ?

5/ Fujifilm are known also to have taken great interest in the early succes of m43, and are rumoured to have products of a ‘similar’ nature in development.

6/ Samsung NX models are likely soon …not m43 standard, but a miniatuised system along the same lines

7/ Additional to the existing E-P1, I also have reliable confirmation that Olympus will launch a total of three new m43 bodies, planned to see the light of day over the next six months … although my source expects that this may more likely stretch over 9/12 months …but that’s still an ambitious output, and Olympus are ‘very seriously comitted’ to m43.

8/ Based on that last statement, we should see the introduction of several new m43 lenses …hopefully sooner rather than later.

Given that m43 is really just in its infancy, and already seems to offer superb performance …albeit with a few fixable deficiencies so far …this is, from what was expected to be niche, fast becoming a type of product range seen by the major (& smaller) players as critical to their ongoing survival – let alone their ongoing success and increased market share & profitability. 

Extrapolate accordingly, and if the consumer-led, and pro-led, revolution really gets under way, we’ll really be spoilt for choice. That has to be a great situation for all of us absolute enthusiasts, and marks a truly interesting era in digital imaging. I’m observing all of this in some detail, and will step in when I feel the time’s right…and that doesn’t necessarily mean waiting for too long – but there really is so much on its way AND SOON.

In the meantime, if you’re already using, or considering a DSLR, you may find some interesting reading at http://nikonpro.wordpress.com

For more, see also http://1001noisycameras.com



Following my ‘AR’-style post of a few days ago, this is in response to a few requests for the ‘saturated’ version of the image, without the posterisation effect from the DxO FilmPack Polachrome simulation.

One great advantage of small-sensor cameras – whether LX3, F200EXR, CX1 or a swathe of others – is that they always exhibit great depth-of-field, even at their largest aperture :

LX3 : f2 at 24mm equivalent

F200EXR  : f3.3 at 28mm equivalent

CX1 : f3.3 at 28mm equivalent

This makes small-sensor cameras absolutely ideal for shooting subjects like architecture & landscapes, or for maintaining decent depth-of-field in night & low-light shots, where the camera’s maximum aperture is needed to let the light in.

Add to this the huge benefit these days of in-built image stabilisation – whether sensor-shift or optical IS – and the result is a very useful photographic tool that supplements an SLR very well. On some occasions, it’s definitely my preference – usually no need for a tripod – and in 2009, the results can be very impressive.

Certainly a far cry from my first Fuji 0.95 Mp (!) digital clunker that was pretty well only able to produce thumbnails through to 6×4 at a push !

The market is maturing well, and 2009 has seen some excellent & innovative compacts, SLRs that are more highly-specced with better high-ISO capabilities than ever before, and more recently, the new ‘Hybrids’ …Micro Four-Thirds cameras such as Panasonic G1/GH1/GF-1, and of course the Olympus E-P1.

So far, I own several compacts and SLRs ….But why no hybrid (yet)?  

See my next post for why I’m holding off (for now!)

Many small- (and large!-)sensor camera images at http://nickbland.zenfolio.com  and much more information for the camera-inquisitive at http://1001noisycameras.com



Despite all of the interesting stuff on the ‘net, I still enjoy reading a magazine – especially one that’s been really well printed onto high-quality paper …and when I say ‘reading’, I suppose I mean looking at and appreciating the photographs. Most people – around 80% of the population – respond much more to an image than to text …so we’re not alone !

When a magazine image is so well-printed that you can almost appreciate the quality of the equipment used to make the image, as well as the photographer’s clear ability, some individuals can be convinced that it’s the gear that made the difference, and invest in new kit accordingly. Known well to the musical fraternity – and also being a musician myself – there’s a syndrome that has many ‘sufferers’ …G.A.S.  That’s Gear Acquisition Syndrome.

It’s as applicable to cameras & associated gear as much as it is new musical instruments, amps etc, and it’s all too easy to be drawn in. And it’s not as if I’m immune, it has to be said.

But that’s sometimes what can make things really interesting. If you read the previous post, re Hasselblad H3D/Leaf, Sinar & PhaseOne backs etc, and their place in the commercial photography world, you’ll know that I see it as a challenge. Yes, I have a D3 – one of the finest cameras on the planet – that’s usually to be seen connected to a Nikon ED24-70 f2.8 lens – one of the finest lenses on the planet ….but as a combo, not always the most convenient to cart around. And they’re in for lens repair and calibration at the moment.

My F200EXR is these days pretty well always with me. There’s no RAW file capability, no off-camera flash facility (although it could be ‘slaved’) …it’s little more than ‘point & shoot’. But the quality levels being achieved these days in compact cameras mean that its uses go way beyond taking ‘snaps’. 

Careful setup & usage – and image processing – can result in some great image quality that would have been strictly SLR material in the not-too-distant past. But that’s all changed. I’ll be going into some detail in future posts about achieving ultimate quality from a compact – some readers (of the 82,000 so far) have asked for an e-book, which I may well consider if there’s enough demand. Let me know if that might be useful to you.

The image above is another of my ‘personal challenges’ – visualising what I’d aim for if I had the D3/24-70/tripod with me, and all the time in the World for careful set-up, composition, processing etc ….all the things that happen at the start of the process in the commercial photography domain – and how I could achieve not dissimilar results from one of the very best compacts around – could be with the LX3, or in this case, the Fujifilm F200EXR ‘pocket rocket’.

Job done.

Much more on Fujifilm’s F200EXR (and F100fd/F30), Panasonic LX3, Ricoh CX1, Nikon D3 & D200 at http://nickbland.zenfolio.com.



It’s a well-known fact that images appearing in The Architectural Review – the must-read UK mag for architects – are often captured on absolutely the highest-quality imaging devices known to man : Hasselblad H3D (soon H4D), H prime lenses, Sinar, Leaf and PhaseOne digital backs of 30Mp and upwards, Nikon D3X, Canon 1Ds III ….the best available. This is of course the norm for much commercial work these days, and art directors & image editors insist on a certain level of quality.

Why ? Especially when they’re not going to be printed at poster-size ? Well, the consideration is that the capture of the finest detail is paramount, alongside excellent colour rendition and overall white balance, use of  specialist  ’tilt&shift’  (ie PC-) lenses etc.

I challenged myself to see what I could achieve with the F200EXR, in particular aiming to replicate fairly high-res (ok, not 40/50Mp !) files, with a definite ‘AR’ look. I’m happy with the results, one of which is above.

How did I get it to look this way ? 

1/ Normal file processing in Capture NX ….levels, sharpening, saturation – the usual

2/ Correction in Photoshop to lose the converging verticals …didn’t have a crane handy when I made the image

3/ DxO Labs FilmPack …Polaroid Polachrome Colour Positive setting, with a few tweaks

High-end Medium Format Digital back & lenses/pro retouching etc etc  £40K …. versus F200EXR  : £249

Don’t get me wrong here – the Hasselblad H3D  that I’ve experienced is capable of capturing absolutely unbelievable detail – sometimes too much !  Hardly the same, but I think the F200EXR rose to the challenge on this occasion.

As usual, much more at http://nickbland.zenfolio.com